Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma ; (12): 539-542, 2011.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-474294

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo systematically review the curative effect and safety of compound realgar and natural indigo tablet (CRNIT) therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). MethodsThe clinical data of randomized trials on SinoMed, CNKI, VIP,WANFANG DATA,CBA, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library were searched by internet,in addition to manual retrieval and collecting all published literatures randomized controlled trials (RCT) about CRNIT therapy in APL home and abroad.Retrieval line was up to March 2011. According to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, screening all literatures and evaluating their qualities. The rate of complete remission (CR), time to CR, recurrence rate, mortality, rate of adverse reaction and so on were used as evaluation indicators for meta-analysis by RevMan 5.1.Results Data from six RCTs involving 391 APL patients,including 2 RCTs about comparison of CRNIT and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO), 4 RCTs about comparison of CRNIT and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) (including adding 1 RCT about comparison of CRNIT + ATRA and ATRA). Time to CR: CRNIT was longer than ATRA and ATO (WMD = 3.14, 95 % CI 0.99-5.29, P= 0.004). Headache incidence: CRNIT was lower than ATRA (OR = 0.10, 95 % CI 0.02-0.45, P = 0.003). 5-year disease-free survival rate: CRNIT was better than ATRA (OR = 7.22, 95 % CI 1.40-37.25, P = 0.02). There were no statistical significance in the rest of the Meta-analysis results.ConclusionThe time to CR of CRNIT is longer than that of ATRA and ATO.The short-term effect of CRNIT is similar to that of ATRA and ATO.The 5-year disease-free survival rate of CRNIRT may be higher than that of ATRA.

2.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 458-60, 2005.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-634258

ABSTRACT

To establish a simple, sensitive and effective technique for the identification of six common dermatophytes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) targeting Topoisomerase II gene were used. The DNA of 6 common dermatophytes was amplified by primer dPsD1 and then primers dPsD2. The products generated by dPsD2 were digested with restriction enzyme Hinc II and Hinf I separately. A DNA fragment of about 3390 bp was amplified by using primer dPsD1 from the genomic DNA of each dermatophyte species. The product of dPsD2 was 2380 bp and the restriction profiles of Hinc II and Hinf I were between 58-1670 bp. By using PCR-RFLP, all of the 6 dermatophytoses were diagnosed to species level and no obvious difference identification between Hinc II and Hinf I. It is concluded that the PCR-RFLP identification of dermatophytes by Hinc II or Hinf I is efficient and rapid in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Arthrodermataceae/classification , Arthrodermataceae/genetics , Arthrodermataceae/isolation & purification , DNA Topoisomerases, Type II/genetics , DNA, Fungal/analysis , DNA, Fungal/genetics , Dermatomycoses/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
3.
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) ; (6): 458-460, 2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-322960

ABSTRACT

To establish a simple, sensitive and effective technique for the identification of six common dermatophytes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) targeting Topoisomerase Ⅱ gene were used. The DNA of 6 common dermatophytes was amplified by primer dPsD1 and then primers dPsD2. The products generated by dPsD2were digested with restriction enzyme Hinc Ⅱ and Hinf Ⅰ separately. A DNA fragment of about 3390 bp was amplified by using primer dPsD1 from the genomic DNA of each dermatophyte species. The product of dPsD2 was 2380 bp and the restriction profiles of Hinc Ⅱ and Hinf Ⅰ were between 58- 1670 bp. By using PCR-RFLP, all of the 6 dermatophytoses were diagnosed to species level and no obvious difference identification between Hinc Ⅱ and Hinf Ⅰ. It is concluded that the PCR-RFLP identification of dermatophytes by Hinc Ⅱ or Hinf Ⅰ is efficient and rapid in clinical practice.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL